Template:Too few opinions
 | The examples and perspective in this article may not include all significant viewpoints. (December 2024) |
Usage[edit]
{{Too few opinions|{{subst:DATE}}}}{{Too few opinions|section|{{subst:DATE}}}}{{Too few opinions|discuss={{TALKPAGENAME}}#section|{{subst:DATE}}}}
Do not substitute this template.
Purpose[edit]
This article message box tags articles which may suffer from systemic bias by failing to include significant viewpoints. It will categorise tagged articles into Category:Articles needing more viewpoints.
This tag should only be applied to articles for which significant different perspectives are reasonably believed to exist. Please explain your concerns promptly on the article's talk page. If you do not identify the opinions that are missing, then any editor may remove this tag.
Parameters[edit]
- The first unnamed parameter, if present, gives the type of page. It defaults to "article". Alternatives might include "list" and "category".
date=discuss=
Example[edit]
You might use this code:
{{Too few opinions|list|date=February 2010|discuss={{TALKPAGENAME}}#Too few opinions}}
which appears:
| The examples and perspective in this list may not include all significant viewpoints. (February 2010) |
Note the use of {{TALKPAGENAME}} in the code, rather than the literal page name. This keeps the talk page name consistent even if the page is moved/renamed.
See also[edit]
- {{POV}}